7 Responses to “Define Content Authority: Where Less is More”

  1. September 10, 2011 at 7:05 pm #

    Are you being ironic?

    You talk about limiting posts and have two in one day! LOL

    Anyhow, just messin’ with ya. I do get your point.

    I think perfect examples of this are viperchill and blogtyrant. Where they may not update frequently but the posts are always chocked full of good stuff.

    I would consider both of those authority sites even though the total posts are likely under that magical 100 mark.

    I could make an argument for the other side of the debate too. (just because I like to argue)

    You know I am personally a fan of the long in-depth post. But not everyone is that way. Some people want to find a narrow topic, read 400 words on it and be done.

    (Heck, for some people reading a tweet is strenuous, but I should avoid getting into my disgust at the lack of “readers” around these days.)

    So there is something to be said about both sides.

    The great takeaway was what you said in the end about reworking old content. This is actually something I have begun to do on a small scale. Sometimes it is simply keyword optimizing these articles. Sometimes it means radical changes. And sometimes it means just deleting an article that was chatty and breezy fluff.

    No matter what style works for people an occasional edit can only be for the good.

    • Murray Lunn
      September 14, 2011 at 6:44 pm #

      I can’t help when I’m on a roll; gotta love those days when you wanna push hard on content and that was certainly a day to do so :)

      What I’m going to be focusing on, in 2012, is a lot more horizontal growth rather than vertical. One of the main reasons why I put this post up was to kick up a few ideas about learning when to say “okay, I’ve got a lot out there – how do I make it work for me”. Like you said, some of us love the long-form but a lot of people have short attention spans. The good thing is that when we build these long-form posts, we’re really making it as if it were a complete product in their own – it’s pillar, it’s valuable and it’s there to stick.

      What I’d like to kick up is this idea that you blog as if it were a website where its less about fresh content and more about major growth through the use of optimization. Rather than 1,000 posts doing the leg work, you have 100 that does just as well. You keep your message refined and don’t need people skipping around, constantly, to find information – it becomes a hub.

      Not sure where all I’m going with this but I think you understand. More or less: make your assets work for you rather than duct taping them with new content, constantly. I suppose :)

  2. Keith
    September 10, 2011 at 7:24 pm #

    Actually this is a very interesting idea! I may consider somewhat of a hybrid of this (both A and B bloggers) for my new site….

    • Murray Lunn
      September 14, 2011 at 6:48 pm #

      Yeah man!

      What I’ve been thinking, lately, is to more or less build sites around the idea of having about 100 super strong articles that stand their own and then merely use the smaller updates (the more MWF posts) as a way to reference them and to remind people that the information is out there. It keeps people stuck on the blog but it also alerts them about content they may not have yet discovered.

  3. bo
    September 11, 2011 at 1:38 am #

    Love this. So glad your back.

  4. Tammi Kibler | Freelance Writer
    September 11, 2011 at 3:11 pm #

    Great question. Every blog is different. I have heard some affiliate blogs succeed with a handful of pages. Many of the bloggers I follow post every day, others thrive with one long post each month; neither style is wrong if it suits the blogger’s purpose.

    I agree you should go through your inventory and shine up your older posts, particularly those that pull traffic from the search engines. You can “forward link” them to current posts, mine them for product creation, and ensure they have a clear call-to-action.

    I am looking at one of my blogs now with an eye to creating a “start here” page that points to posts that will bring a new subscriber up to speed.

    • Murray Lunn
      September 14, 2011 at 6:50 pm #

      The ‘start here’ is a great idea Tammi.

      I did this for one of my larger blogs because I noticed, after looking at heatmaps, that people were going all over the place and missing out on some really great content because blogs, by default, are a little difficult to navigate because of the way they are setup. Of course, you need to have enough content to put together one of these pages but I can tell you, through analytics, that the ‘start here’ page on the blog gets bout 30% of the initial clicks and gets people deep into the website to explore.

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge